2/6/2018 4:23:24 PM: You don’t have to think of the relationship so much as Daddy-daughter, but more as possessing the qualities many dominant men neglect to share with their lovers: care, coddling, guidance, protection, discipline, teaching, playfulness, cuddling, as well as introducing new steps in her sexual development.

11/20/2017 1:13:19 PM: My views on Daddy/Daughter Dynamics of a d/s daddy/daughter relationship should mirror and reflect how a biological parent is with their child. No collar should be in these relationships. The same way you would treat your child is the same way you should treat this sub. The same for the sub, the same way you treat your parent is the same way you should treat your Dom, with a kink (taboo) twist because its sexual consent between both parties.

11/14/2017 5:34:49 PM: What is the difference between a submissive and a slave you ask? The heart of submission is the choice to submit and the option to say 'No'. The submissive decides how much authority she will cede to another, how much control she will bow to, and what aspects of her life she will surrender to the dominant's command. Submissive power exchange is about choice: about the option to decide how one feels about a demand and what one is going to do about it. At any point that the sub is not comfortable with this arrangement, it is within her rights to say 'No, I'm not going to do that', and this becomes a signal to the couple that they need to renegotiate something. It does not completely derail the power dynamic between them. A submissive chooses to submit and has the option to say 'no' in at least one aspect of her life. A submissive who is controlled in large tracts of her life – her sexuality, work, dress, social habits, etc - may fall into a space of obedience where orders in those arenas are never mulled over or reassessed (in the sense of 'renewing the choice to submit every time a demand is levied upon her'). I contend that this is not counter to the definition I offer above but a special subset thereof: even for such a closely-controlled submissive, there remains some area of her life or aspect of her person where she retains autonomy, or where it is her option to decide if she wishes to submit in the moment. In short: a submissive chooses to submit and has the option in some area or another to say 'no' to a dominant command. Slavery How, then, does consensual slavery differ from submission? First and foremost, slavery hinges upon a commitment to obedience. The slave does not revisit issues such as 'should I submit?' or 'How do I feel about that? Will I say yes or no?' When a dominant order is issued, whether or not the slave agrees with it, she is obedient in the same manner that a soldier is who has enlisted in the Army. Secondly, in consensual slavery a person gives themselves over to the control of another as completely as is humanly possible. This means not only a high degree of obedience, but that there is actually a chattel property context to the relationship. I refer not to a legal relationship, of course, but to a mutual understanding of ownership and property status that arises between the parties. While both slaves and submissives are often fondly referred to as 'property', in the sense of consensual slavery the slave becomes literally (by mutual agreement) the property of the Owner. It is not unheard of for slaves to be sold by an Owner and to go willingly to their new Master or Mistress. A slave commits to obey. A 'no' becomes a dealbreaker in a way it can never be for a submissive. Thirdly, a slave cannot say 'No' without completely abrogating the very basis of the Master/slave agreement. A 'No' from a slave is a terminal deal-breaker in a way that it is not for a submissive.