I just finished reading a number of profiles and to be quite honest I was not very impressed.  Many of them were very lame, a couple not too bad, and some, I would RUN LIKE HELL if the Domme was to contact me (I wouldn't contact her for sure).   Isn't there a Lady out there that likes bondage, tickling, spanking  etc without wanting to screw a sub in the ass or burn him, or brand him etc.  I am a submissive, but not an idiot

    Does any Domme on here know or care about what a submissive wants?  I am an old man and no longer can perform as I once did.  Yet, I have a want, maybe even a need.  I want to feel protected.  A big word there -- protected--.  I read something on here from a Lady and it struck a chord with me.  --Protected--.  When does that occur?  For me, it means I am bound and helpless, but under the watchful eye of Domme.  I never have felt more --protected-- than when I was bound, blindfolded, and (lightly) gagged for a period of time.  I couldn't see the Domme, we didn't communicate, Yet I knew she was there and wouldn't allow any harm to fall on me.  I was completely free to allow myself (or at least my mind) to run free.

What a glorious feeling.

    A few years ago a Domme lady in Los Angeles had a special.  For a paltry sum, she would tie and forget for an hour or two.  I did it once and loved evey minute of it.  Unfortunely she moved.  I haven't been able to find another Lady to do this.   Oh well, I am getting old and do have my memories.

      Enjoy all! 

OK, time to get into trouble if anyone ever read this.

  I believe that 98 percent of the women on here who call themselves Dommes/Mistresseas have little idea of what they are doing.

   I believe that nearly 100 percent of the women on ere who call themselves Dommes/Mistresses are simply out to seperate a submissive and his/her money with as little effortas possible.

    What ever happened to the professional Dommes/Mistresses who used to be on here.  At least they gave something back with play sessions and didn't expect a lifetime commitment without ever having played. 

      Really sickens me to see the direction this site is going.

   Is a true Mistress/submissive relationship oly about the needs/wants of the Mistress?  I think not  One of the criteria I use in responding to Mistress profiles is how they word who or what they are looking for.   I am a submissive, but I still have needs in a relationship and I am not talking about sexual needs and believe it or not, I expect these needs to be fulfilled.  Yet, many Mistress profiles on here expressively point ou that they are not interested in a submissive's needs.

     For example.  I need to be restrained during play/punishment.  It makes it much more meaning ful for me and allows me to "let go".  I am fairly large and if not restraied may unintentional "strike" out at my Mistress.  If not restrained I must always old part of me back to stay in check so to speak  In my many years of during BDSM i have only ben in sub-space a few times and yes I was restrained each time.  An example of this was once I received a rather hard whipping (not normally my thing) and because of the way I was restrained was able to not only take it, but completely enjoy it in a way I had never been able to do before.  I also admit that the Mistress' skill played a huge role in this.

      Another area of concern for me is topping from the bottom that so may Ladies comment on.  Is this wrong for a submissive?  Again, I think not in all situations.  There have been times when I have done this usually when first getting to know a Mistress.  For example>  I have a huge tickle fetish and love a good tickling (restrained of course) wiht limited mercy.  However, the kind of tickling I enjoy is a light, almost caressing touch, not a heavy, dig in type tickling.  How does the Lady know this unless she is told or instructed.  Another example of my topping from the bottome is to "tease" the Mistress into putting forth a greater effort.  During a spanking for example I might make a comment about "hitting like a girl".  For some reason, that many Dommes dislike that and spank harder.   Am I being a smart ass?  Yes.  An I topping from the bottom?  Yes.  Does it help the Mistress meet my needs (and hers)?  Yes.

    Enough rant for now.  Besides no one reads these long journal entries.

I was just sitting here reading profiles when a stray thought strunk me. Why don't male subs overposwer the female Dommes/Mistresses on here. After all most of the males are fairly large (i.e. 6 feet, 245 pounds) while most of the female Dommes are relatively small (5" 6", 120 lbs).  What is it in our make-up allows these women to dominate. 

I don't know, but in my case I was brought up to respect females and would never dream of hitting one or even grabbing one, but what about you other subs. 

Mistresses -  do you feel safe meeting a submissive?  If so, why?   Just wondering.

    Is it possible for an honest submissive to find a Mistress on here.  I am beginnings to think not.  Between the Financial Dommes, the fakes, the professionals (nothing against them), and the out and out lairs .....finding a "real" Mistress is next to impossible.

    I also think that CM needs a catagory for Lesbians much like the catagory for Switches.  It seems more and more of the Ladies are looking only for women.  Nothing wrong with this, everyone has a right to be happy...but I think a new catagory is needed.  One sub's opinion

While I know that the majority of "women" on here are eithr fakes or out to seperate a fool and his money, I am still shocked at how many of them can't handle a complient.  I have  a hair fetish and love nice, clean , shiny hair, especially if the Lady has bangs and I have complimented a few Ladies.  Usually I receive no response at all, not even a thank you.  Makes one wonder........

BIRTHDAY TIME - RIPE OLD AGE OF 65.

FAKE DOMME NOTICE:    ALL FINANCIAL DOMMES ARE FAKE.   MOSTLY POOR SLUTS OUT TO SEPERATE A FOOL AND HIS MONEY.  TOO DAMN LAZY TO WORK......AND TO BOOT MOST OF THEM ARE MEN.  THOSE WHO GIVE/SEND MONEY/GIFT CARDS/ETC ARE THE WORSE TYPE OF FOOL.